On Friday 23 September 2005 02:57 am, Rumen Yotov wrote: > Still another issue, is there a way to use an "epatch" after which it's > known you'll have an error, which later is fixed by another patch.
no, and that behavior will probably never be added to epatch > IMHO it's easier just to fix the patch (if possible). so fix the patch ? write it a different way ? combine the patches ? -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
