Chris White wrote:
Alright, so here's what I think on the whole thing now that I made a nice tidy
[Summary] thread.
There seems to be some concern about AT testers having more privileges than
some other devs. First off, I hope everyone saw the readonly access, and
even so, the whole point of this thing is to make development smoother.
Let me clarify here. I'm not concerned about ATs having more privileges
at all. I just want to know why if we're making them full developers
for all intents and purposes, we don't go the extra step and get them
commit access after a probationary period? It seems like this is
supposed to be the end goal anyway. Basically, I feel like this GLEP
goes outside the bounds of what I think of when somebody mentions the
arch testers. Maybe it's just me though.
-Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
