-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen P. Becker wrote: >> You're somehow implying that being an AT is not as good as being a dev. > > > Wrong. > >> My understanding is that this GLEP is supposed to make AT as good as >> being a dev, but with a different role, one that doesn't need commit >> access. > > > My point exactly! Why have another category? > >> If the people involved decide they want to become committing >> devs, it also make it easier to make that transition. If they don't >> want to commit, they can stay as an AT. > > > Then shall we reclassify all the developers that currently don't have > commit access to the portage tree? > > -Steve
And how is an "Arch Dev" different from say a member of devrel? It's not a category per se, it's a role. Person X does Devrel, person Y does portage, you do Arch Developing on MIPS, and new dev Z is an Arch Tester. How does this make anything more difficult than it already is? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQyYuUWzglR5RwbyYAQLyJA/+KiO5kzJGjqX57fTWOM6eN86JiCmfDvfY YzbnEBc7IThiNxvNTyPCnzPE9Wo22MqrVKdcWIrKYx0T+xkX89EzV4779vmhj00f qhDRSDRx09nENQ2mIDDU7733LgMKgAp0IqVgmBH48HUKDjAOEgVhHO82Byii9Yiw ysXoJkfth6RQ44PW5TTYvD9d+r+RKB4PYk6Q1SrJAk9yYaL6HDq/zrRMrFvNeABH HojBiOkdG/IvbF2jW/A7nx1V27HAzo21XR+9EbtUIrrMc5fP2V4UcTQ39TZGQRo2 A33qEMsZmNmE/0awcEmSkglQfGQ6VSVT/Ha2SC9NuIAIRXE3ynVc1bi+T5II5W/n +HTa0Bq6cTmTNOaxNU1Ym6A5aiQdfrcQYvH/yYBJGAHwr4XseLl5qQoCycn77mjP aeFo81a/Vm31k36CZROR4iIWid8uNl2PnmBSyvnYJpWX8UaqES92JWUm34yS2sND e5v/srIsdQf+chaxHwaU9r6R0OQEdIuIbyh6OD/khEuSrrcUbsPpTyOUnCVNduC3 wxqOqUsLerSmL/PPjZxCxV2xpsbsr+PmhPWBQY8NgOAsY6mVEgok6Cx2jMF6DVK5 uk/zomSi4uMvhpps/LotDImi5/TcTsBnnoKjIIOpjfcvAv8U9GzZVBrnmONuqW1C wO+x++yjIJk= =S6q7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list