Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 04:29:45PM CDT] > > I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some > > time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. > or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo > infrastructure (?)
Ah, I see. To the best of my knowledge that just needs to be worked out w/ the GLEP 15 people and infra. I dropped into -infra and they said that there's space for it, but that bug # 98282 lists a couple of contentious points. (Also, the gentooexperimental scripts "about" page seems to suggest that their framework differs from the "official" version.) > > Huh? Why should Mr_Bones_ need to go around fixing broken encodings? > > He just has to break the legs of the offending devs.... > Would be better if > (1) it wasn't Mr_Bones alone and > (2) there was an agreed on policy so that (if needed) repeat offenders > can be sanctioned > (e.g. by flipping their commit bit) > that of course needs some backing from the general dev population and > devrel, also the policies should be properly defined so that noone can > weasel out by invoking "it's always been like this" Oh, of course. I just don't agree that all GLEPs that involve QA should be put on hold until we improve QA, however. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpYbhRPetGX2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
