On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 20:09 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: > agreed talk/communcation is fine, if the maintainer is only trying to flex > muscles and does not have a good reason, the arch team ought to be able to do > what is best for gentoo and not be shot down by a (hm) stubborn(?) > maintainer, if the maintaner could do that, the arch team would be quite > limited in its effectiveness
That's a good example - one I hope doesn't occur too often ;-) Equally, there'll be times when the roles are reversed, and it's the arch team member flexing muscle. We're all human after all :) Still, it'd only be fair for the arch team to assume the support burden for the package version if they do this w/out the support of the package maintainer. Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
