On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 20:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > If the package maintainer doesn't think their package is ready, it > should be in package.mask.
I'm not arguing against that. I agree with it. Please stop trying to hijack this and divert attention away from my point. I'm asking nicely :) I'm asking that you assume any support burden that you create. It only seems fair. If you're in an arch team, the package maintainer doesn't agree that the package should be stable, and you're not willing to take on the support for that package either, don't stabilise it. We shouldn't stabilise packages where no-one's willing to support it. That's all I'm asking for, to go into the GLEP. It's no big deal. If the arch team believe that know better than the package maintainer, then they must know enough to be able to support it, no? ;-) Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
