Vapier wrote: [Sun Sep 04 2005, 01:00:41PM CDT] > this isnt quite true ... non-x86 archs usually take their queues for > when packages should be moved to stable from the maintainer of the > package
Perfectly reasonable. > in other words, arch teams generally defer to maintainers (and rightly > so) as to when newer versions should go stable I agree that the arch teams shouldn't be marking packages stable in advance of when the the maintainer thinks it's ready. At the same time, it's the respective arch teams, as "owners" of their entire stable tree, who (in my opinion) should have the final "okay" on a package going stable, since they're the ones with experience of the entire stable tree. Does that make a bit more sense? -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgplQgW8w9jqF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
