On Thursday 18 August 2005 09:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > | I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would > > make > > | it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help > | enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking, > | please point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other > | instance. > > OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn.
Actually, it says "SW". Instead of searching up what SW meant, I decided to look at the GLEP itself where I figured the status would be written in English. It does have a status listed but apparently it is incorrect. -- Jason Stubbs
pgpKr6kzGieXL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
