Jason Stubbs wrote: [Wed Aug 17 2005, 08:09:39PM EDT] > I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That > would make it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making > the QA tool help enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that > line of thinking, please point it out in case I fall into the same > trap in some other instance.
You might be right. I wasn't aware that GLEP 31 was approved before it was withdrawn. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp2qJCbzyyD7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
