-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
> Jon Portnoy wrote:
>
>> I didn't say that.
>
>> I'm saying that (a) team leads do not want to waste their time in
>>
> such a
>> way just to give you warm fuzzies (b) devs do not particularly
>> want their team lead reviewing every single action they take, it
>> sends the message that devs don't know wtf they're doing and need
>> their hands
> held
>
>
> (a) Its not a waste of time, and it is a FACT that peer review
> improves quality.
>
> (b) That's just a little prima donna...
Nathan you have this misconception that just cause a bug apears on
one system it is gonna apear on multiple systems. Most compilation
bugs that I have seen are usually due to user not maintaining their
configurations properly. You also still fail to understand that most
of us maintain more packages than just one and it is impossible for us
to take and drop what we are working on to help test and confirm that
a bug does exist and is not user error. As far as team leads go they
make sure the project stay on task and packages and bugs are handled
in a timely manner. I would like to know do you want us to have 15
devs test for a particular bug if a team lead is not avaliable or
would you like us to have just 2 people test?
This has gotten way out of control with time and how issues are
delt with, personally I think that you have a vendictive against a few
devs that have closed bugs on you that they have not been able to
replicate and/or find invalid. I can not say either way all I know is
you in FACT have a misconception of how much time goes into testing
before a package is moved to stable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC0IW9GDfjNg8unQIRAvhNAJ9gXX7KNauZuYTvR4exeHUR7t6zdgCgk8yH
LKl2nGSz2dLjmGrPb5gJAa4=
=BzWw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
