Nathan L. Adams wrote:
Gregorio Guidi wrote:
Any proposal that implies an enourmous increase of our human resources is
really useless for us.
Please accept the fact that we cannot change our resources at will, and adapt
any suggestion to this simple principle.
Now *that* is a reasonable argument.
But come on guys, I'm suggesting *one* look at a bug by an independent
party before marking it done.
That's reasonable, but I don't see that party being a Team Lead or even
a dev. If there's a bug filed and another user can confirm it, it's
Verified. That's the whole idea behind the status.
I don't really see much to gain by adding another step in the bug
reporting process. Some projects use it, some don't. I don't think
b.g.o is formal enough re. bugzilla to warrant it.
I do agree with the original point. Reports shouldn't be marked
resolved unless the bug is fixed or permanent, or not enough info is
given to verify that a bug actually exists.
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
