On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:46 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > If we can move away from some of our devfs-like names, we stand to > reclaim a lot of memory from everyone's machines. As an example, if we > drop all of the tty/pts/vc/vcc symlinks, and just go with the default > kernel name, we save 2.5Mb of space in tempfs/ramfs. I've done this on > my machines and everything seems to work just fine (it looks like > everything that was trying to use a tty node was just using the symlink > anyway.) > > So, anyone have any objections to me changing the default udev naming > scheme in this manner?
No objections here. I've been waiting fort his move for a little while now. The only real problems will be with those 2.4 (devfs) users who refuse to move, maybe this is good enough incentive.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
