Christian Hartmann wrote:
Feedback is highly appreciated.
Feedback: I think the first sentence should say "staff" rather than "developer": "Global moderators and site admins should also go through the mentoring process and become official Gentoo developers." Overall it sounds like a good idea as far as QA goes. I think this will be your biggest obstacle: "Recent events such as the election of trustees or the new metastructure poll are effectively affecting the forums, so the wish to be part of the decision as an equal member is present among the moderators." How exactly did recent voting affect the forums and why should Foundation members vote to give you voting rights because of what is affecting the forums? (Assuming Foundation members would have to vote to change who can vote). Its arguable that moderators being non-staff is a good thing because its non-staff essentially censoring and deleting other non-staff in the forums, so make a good case ;) "Forums don't really seem to fit into one of the current categories as they are related to the infrastructure and the documentation project. We suggest putting it in the other category or making a separate one for the forums." Seems like you'd fit perfectly under User Relations, wherever they fall under the toplevel project structure. -- Rob Cakebread Gentoo Linux Developer Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96BA679B Key fingerprint = 5E1A 57A0 0FA6 939D 3258 8369 81C5 A17B 96BA 679B -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
