On Wednesday 15 June 2005 00:52, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:32:06 +0200 > > Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, > > as building does not depend on portage being there. > > Hmm, how do you build an ebuild without portage? Not trying to defend > that dependency, but technically all ebuilds DEPEND on portage (or a > compatible package manager), that's the most implicit dependency of > all.
I think you know what I mean. By definition portage is allready there for the ebuild to be evaluated. It is therefore unnecessary to specify it as a dependency. Besides that for most packages any compatible package manager should work (there just is only portage now though). Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpjPeaaZaGFE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
