On Tuesday 14 June 2005 06:52 pm, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:32:06 +0200 > > Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, > > as building does not depend on portage being there. > > Hmm, how do you build an ebuild without portage? Not trying to defend > that dependency, but technically all ebuilds DEPEND on portage (or a > compatible package manager), that's the most implicit dependency of all.
i assume you didnt read the reply i made already ... gcc-config DEPEND-ed on a specific version of portage (the first one to provide portageq to userspace) -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
