maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Jonathan Smith wrote: > > > > I noticed a bug [1] which, when resolved after the upgrade, did not list > > the cause of resolution (in this case, it was a dup). Is this no longer > > required? I rather liked that feature, as it enabled people to see, at a > > quick glance, the final status of the bug... > > > > [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92861 > > smithj, the bug showed that information for me: > > > Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92861 > > Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92861 > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > > > > > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-17 01:46 PDT > - ------- > > > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 *** > > Here it is, the last row.
But in the headers it says: Status: RESOLVED Resolution: -- -* Georgi Georgiev -* Humor in th Court: Q: Do you drink when -* *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *- you're on duty? A: I don't drink when I'm *- -* +81(90)2877-8845 -* on duty, unless I come on duty drunk. -* -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
