On Tue, 10 May 2005 22:19:27 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:54:33PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Is there a standard way of handling testing for utility-type
| > eclasses? For versionator I currently have a
| > __versionator__test_blah function included in the eclass (source
| > versionator.eclass works, it doesn't have any portage-specific
| > code), but this is going to get a bit messy when I add in another
| > few dozen tests...
| > 
| > Maybe a simple test harness could be added as an option for the new
| > eclass / elib setup?
| Elaborate on the tests...

Best example I can give are the kind of thing that's in versionator
already. The tests in the updated version in bug 87157 are probably
better than the ones in the tree...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachment: pgpkSWcbxzZ6C.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to