Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>On Tue, 10 May 2005 21:54:33 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>| Is there a standard way of handling testing for utility-type eclasses?
>| For versionator I currently have a __versionator__test_blah function
>| included in the eclass (source versionator.eclass works, it doesn't
>| have any portage-specific code), but this is going to get a bit messy
>| when I add in another few dozen tests...
>
>And along the same lines... Please test the updated versionator.eclass
>that I have posted to [1]. I'd really rather find any bugs *before* it
>hits the tree :)
>
>[1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87157
>
>
>
Nice and 30% faster here . Not tested version_sort() but I've already
idea on where to use it.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
