On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:57:12 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > SVN uses transactions and | > changesets. These make a heck of a lot more sense if they're done on | > a per project basis. | | reason?
Because you can pull out a meaningful and relevant changeset without having to arse around with path prefixes. | > Unlike with CVS, this makes a big difference -- SVN | > revision IDs are actually meaningful, | | SVN repository IDs represent the state of the whole repository at a | given time, nothing more or less. Not repo IDs. Revision IDs. | Hmm... besides, the ASF is just having a single repository for all | their public projects (with about 1000+ contributors) w/o any | problems. So we should make the same mistakes as them? Sure, a single repo would be usable, but multiple repos would be a heck of a lot better. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpUGxYUvVgIF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
