On Wednesday 13 April 2005 3:03 pm, Aaron Walker wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:33:46 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > | Finally, just don't use svn if you feel that uncomfortable with it. No > > | one said that cvs will go away. I'm tired of reading your 'svn is > > | hard to merge because it *is* hard to merge' posts :( > > > > Eh? Dude, I'm one of the people that's been asking for SVN from the > > beginning. SVN is considerably easier to merge than CVS -- however, it's > > a pain in the ass if you're using multiple projects per repo because > > then you *have* to give it full paths. > > > > Really, I think you should reread the entire thread if you think I'm > > against SVN. > > Yeah actually the glep wouldnt exist at all w/o Ciaran pawning it off on me > :)
I take it back. Really I just wanted to stop that 'I like it better that way' discussion. But yet, I'm responding again. However, I take it back, sorry though. -- Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt 16:45:13 up 21 days, 5:51, 0 users, load average: 0.42, 0.31, 0.26
pgpLX7Cwojlcw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
