Thank you, Craig. We resent the signed SGA. Please check and let us know if anything is missing.
Best, Kranti On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 9:05 PM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kranti, > > You are off to a good start in the incubator. I'll look for the updated > documents. > > Warm regards, > Craig > > > > On Feb 5, 2025, at 16:05, Kranti K. Parisa <kranti.par...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Craig! > > > > 1. We'll send the SGAs again. > > 2. We'll brainstorm more about the repo structure with mentors and Iggy > community and request the setup accordingly > > 3. We will remind everyone to email the ICLAs, and request them to > mention "iggy" before sending, if they haven't sent the emails yet. > > > > Best, > > Kranti > > > >> On Feb 5, 2025, at 3:51 PM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Dear Kranti, > >> > >>> On Feb 5, 2025, at 07:32, Kranti Parisa <kranti.par...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks Craig, we're super excited to join the Apache family. Please > find > >>> the answers to your questions below > >>> > >>> #1 As the creator of Iggy, Piotr Gankiewicz owned the copyright from > April > >>> 2023 - Dec 2024. In Jan 2025 the copyright was transferred to > LaserData, > >>> Piotr is the Co-founder. Both Piotr and myself have signed the SGAs > with > >>> the "Representing" field and sent them over to secretary@ email. > Please let > >>> us know if anything else is needed. > >> > >> Thanks, that information is useful. But the SGA from both Kranti and > Piotr have the wrong first page "Licensor". It should be LaserData for > both documents. > >>> > >>> #2 Yes, others have contributed to the individual SDK repos. If we are > >>> creating separate repos for SDKs, we can nominate them as committers > for > >>> those individual repos. > >> > >> At Apache, we work on trust. So segregating repository permissions > should never be necessary, or a reason for multiple repos. It might be > useful to discuss with projects that have many different release cycles > from a single repo, before making a final decision. > >> > >>> And we also have others being very active in the > >>> community on the Discord channels, contributing to the roadmaps, > feature > >>> definitions, architecture choices, implementation ideas etc. We > anticipate > >>> them to contribute/commit to the main codebase as well as > documentation, > >>> reviewing/merging PRs etc > >>> > >>> #3 We've been brainstorming about a big monolith style repo or keeping > the > >>> individual SDKs, docs, benchmarks etc separate from the core server > repo. > >>> So that we could maintain different sets of committers, independent and > >>> faster release cycles etc. > >> > >> Different sets of committers for different repos might be more trouble > than it is worth. > >> > >>> We've noticed a few examples > >>> like incubator-hugegraph-*, incubator-resilientdb-* etc. If the > >>> recommendation is to limit the repos, we can certainly look into. > >> > >> For this very important decision, I recommend a deep discussion with > your community and your Mentors. > >>> > >>> #4 They've signed the Apache ICLAs in anticipation of Apache Incubator > >>> onboarding as going forward all of their contributions will be on > Apache > >>> Iggy (Incubating). The copyright owners are as described in #1 above > and > >>> SGAs were sent from LaserData already. > >> > >> We have not received most of the ICLAs. Are they perhaps in transit? > >>> > >>> #5 Should we ask all the contributors/proposed initial committers to > resend > >>> the ICLAs with "iggy" listed in the *(optional) notify project* field? > >>> We've mentioned the Iggy VOTE Thread in the emails > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/s94gt19x0vrgoghxvbshogppkbbro7jw > Please let > >>> us know if we it helps to resend them, don't want to spam secretary@ > :) > >> > >> There is no need to resend ICLAs simply to add iggy to the documents. > But note that accounts will not be created for any of the proposed > committers without the ICLAs on file. > >>> > >>> We're learning the Apache Incubator process, thanks for your patience > :) > >> > >> Again, welcome aboard, > >> Craig > >> > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Kranti > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 4:52 AM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Congratulations on the successful vote, and welcome to Apache and the > >>>> Incubator. > >>>> > >>>> As we get the project set up, I just have a few questions about the > legal > >>>> stuff. > >>>> > >>>> 1. Who actually owns the copyright to the code? Piotr Gankiewicz > developed > >>>> the code originally but was ownership transferred to LaserData? > Whoever > >>>> owns the copyright should be identified on the first page of the grant > >>>> ("Licensor") and on the second page (Representing). If it is an > individual > >>>> then the Title should be "owner". Similarly, there is a grant pending > from > >>>> Kranti Parisa, The "Licensor" on this grant needs to be aligned with > the > >>>> Representing field. > >>>> > >>>> 2. There are only three or four (I'm not sure whether the bot needs > to be > >>>> counted :-) significant contributors to the main repo. I did not have > the > >>>> time to look at all dozen repos. Are other contributors/ proposed > >>>> committers mostly involved in the other repos? > >>>> > >>>> 3. The answer to #2 leads me to wonder why there are 12 repos. Unless > the > >>>> ultimate objective is to create sub-projects it seems like unnecessary > >>>> complication and might make it harder for others to contribute. Take > this > >>>> as a question, not as a suggestion to change it. > >>>> > >>>> 4. Most of the names listed in the proposal have "CLA signed". Since > these > >>>> are not recorded in the Apache iclas.txt I assume this means that > they have > >>>> signed a LaserData CLA? In this case, does LaserData own the > copyright to > >>>> the code, or simply a license? If LaserData actually owns their > >>>> contributions, then a grant from LaserData is recommended. > >>>> > >>>> 5. The process will go much smoother if the ICLA has "iggy" listed as > the > >>>> (optional) project. > >>>> > >>>> Good luck, > >>>> Craig > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Feb 3, 2025, at 10:00, Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> With 21 +1 votes ( 10 binding and 11 non-binding) and no +-0 or -1 > >>>>> votes, this vote PASSES. > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6zfgdjwrzs92h4z4x6b25v1r23g3f5yg > >>>>> > >>>>> Welcome to the ASF Iggy! > >>>>> > >>>>> -Yonik > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Craig L Russell > >>>> c...@apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> Craig L Russell > >> c...@apache.org > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > >
