Hi Kranti,

You are off to a good start in the incubator. I'll look for the updated 
documents.

Warm regards,
Craig


> On Feb 5, 2025, at 16:05, Kranti K. Parisa <kranti.par...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Craig!
> 
> 1. We'll send the SGAs again.
> 2. We'll brainstorm more about the repo structure with mentors and Iggy 
> community and request the setup accordingly
> 3. We will remind everyone to email the ICLAs, and request them to mention 
> "iggy" before sending, if they haven't sent the emails yet.
> 
> Best,
> Kranti
> 
>> On Feb 5, 2025, at 3:51 PM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Kranti,
>> 
>>> On Feb 5, 2025, at 07:32, Kranti Parisa <kranti.par...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Craig, we're super excited to join the Apache family. Please find
>>> the answers to your questions below
>>> 
>>> #1 As the creator of Iggy, Piotr Gankiewicz owned the copyright from April
>>> 2023 - Dec 2024. In Jan 2025 the copyright was transferred to LaserData,
>>> Piotr is the Co-founder. Both Piotr and myself have signed the SGAs with
>>> the "Representing" field and sent them over to secretary@ email. Please let
>>> us know if anything else is needed.
>> 
>> Thanks, that information is useful. But the SGA from both Kranti and Piotr 
>> have the wrong first page "Licensor".  It should be LaserData for both 
>> documents.
>>> 
>>> #2 Yes, others have contributed to the individual SDK repos. If we are
>>> creating separate repos for SDKs, we can nominate them as committers for
>>> those individual repos.
>> 
>> At Apache, we work on trust. So segregating repository permissions should 
>> never be necessary, or a reason for multiple repos. It might be useful to 
>> discuss with projects that have many different release cycles from a single 
>> repo, before making a final decision.
>> 
>>> And we also have others being very active in the
>>> community on the Discord channels, contributing to the roadmaps, feature
>>> definitions, architecture choices, implementation ideas etc. We anticipate
>>> them to contribute/commit to the main codebase as well as documentation,
>>> reviewing/merging PRs etc
>>> 
>>> #3 We've been brainstorming about a big monolith style repo or keeping the
>>> individual SDKs, docs, benchmarks etc separate from the core server repo.
>>> So that we could maintain different sets of committers, independent and
>>> faster release cycles etc.
>> 
>> Different sets of committers for different repos might be more trouble than 
>> it is worth.
>> 
>>> We've noticed a few examples
>>> like incubator-hugegraph-*, incubator-resilientdb-* etc. If the
>>> recommendation is to limit the repos, we can certainly look into.
>> 
>> For this very important decision, I recommend a deep discussion with your 
>> community and your Mentors.
>>> 
>>> #4 They've signed the Apache ICLAs in anticipation of Apache Incubator
>>> onboarding as going forward all of their contributions will be on Apache
>>> Iggy (Incubating). The copyright owners are as described in #1 above and
>>> SGAs were sent from LaserData already.
>> 
>> We have not received most of the ICLAs. Are they perhaps in transit?
>>> 
>>> #5 Should we ask all the contributors/proposed initial committers to resend
>>> the ICLAs with "iggy" listed in the *(optional) notify project* field?
>>> We've mentioned the Iggy VOTE Thread in the emails
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/s94gt19x0vrgoghxvbshogppkbbro7jw Please let
>>> us know if we it helps to resend them, don't want to spam secretary@ :)
>> 
>> There is no need to resend ICLAs simply to add iggy to the documents. But 
>> note that accounts will not be created for any of the proposed committers 
>> without the ICLAs on file.
>>> 
>>> We're learning the Apache Incubator process, thanks for your patience :)
>> 
>> Again, welcome aboard,
>> Craig
>> 
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Kranti
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 4:52 AM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Congratulations on the successful vote, and welcome to Apache and the
>>>> Incubator.
>>>> 
>>>> As we get the project set up, I just have a few questions about the legal
>>>> stuff.
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Who actually owns the copyright to the code? Piotr Gankiewicz developed
>>>> the code originally but was ownership transferred to LaserData? Whoever
>>>> owns the copyright should be identified on the first page of the grant
>>>> ("Licensor") and on the second page (Representing). If it is an individual
>>>> then the Title should be "owner". Similarly, there is a grant pending from
>>>> Kranti Parisa, The "Licensor" on this grant needs to be aligned with the
>>>> Representing field.
>>>> 
>>>> 2. There are only three or four (I'm not sure whether the bot needs to be
>>>> counted :-) significant contributors to the main repo. I did not have the
>>>> time to look at all dozen repos. Are other contributors/ proposed
>>>> committers mostly involved in the other repos?
>>>> 
>>>> 3. The answer to #2 leads me to wonder why there are 12 repos. Unless the
>>>> ultimate objective is to create sub-projects it seems like unnecessary
>>>> complication and might make it harder for others to contribute. Take this
>>>> as a question, not as a suggestion to change it.
>>>> 
>>>> 4. Most of the names listed in the proposal have "CLA signed". Since these
>>>> are not recorded in the Apache iclas.txt I assume this means that they have
>>>> signed a LaserData CLA? In this case, does LaserData own the copyright to
>>>> the code, or simply a license? If LaserData actually owns their
>>>> contributions, then a grant from LaserData is recommended.
>>>> 
>>>> 5. The process will go much smoother if the ICLA has "iggy" listed as the
>>>> (optional) project.
>>>> 
>>>> Good luck,
>>>> Craig
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 3, 2025, at 10:00, Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> With 21 +1 votes ( 10 binding and 11 non-binding) and no +-0 or -1
>>>>> votes, this vote PASSES.
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6zfgdjwrzs92h4z4x6b25v1r23g3f5yg
>>>>> 
>>>>> Welcome to the ASF Iggy!
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Yonik
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> c...@apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> Craig L Russell
>> c...@apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org

Reply via email to