>> This is an issue as a company still owns the brand and trademark The doc site will be taken down once the transfer happens. Like Ignite's docs won't be http://www.gridgain.org/documentation/ after its transfer[1].
I intend to explain why it's _currently_ under ceresdb.github.io, but it causes further confusion. I'm sorry for this. >> In other cases e.g. Wth Flex, permission was given by Adobbe to use the >> trademark. > The doc site will be taken down once the transfer happens. So it's not an issue that - >> Has the company given permission to use their trademark? No or N/A. The HoraeDB website won't use CeresDB trademarks. >> If so, how is it allowed to be used? This should be included in the proposal. N/A >> IMO CeresDB is not used where it should be, giving a false impression I updated the proposal as stated above. The changeset can be found at[2]. >>I think the proposal needs some improvements as mentioned above. Thanks for pointing out concrete concerns and issues - they are replied. Best, tison. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/IgniteProposal [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=278466865&selectedPageVersions=10&selectedPageVersions=9 Best, tison. Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2023年11月29日周三 07:21写道： > > Hi, > > > I don't see if anywhere “CeresDB” should be used. If so, HoraeDB will > > change. > > In the proposal, IMO CeresDB is not used where it should be, giving a false > impression. e.g. "HoraeDB has been open-sourced on GitHub for over a year.” > that is not correct as it was CeresDB as the name change only happened a > couple of weeks ago. > > > The org name is where it leaves now and shall not to change. This is > > the same as datafuselabs/opendal doesn't change its org name before > > proposing for incubation. > > There is precedent for keeping the org if it already has widespread use and > would harm the community with its change. However, it is strongly recommended > that the name be changed to the new one. The proposal should state which > direction the project will go in. > > > The same for its doc site ceresdb.github.io/docs > > This is an issue as a company still owns the brand and trademark. In other > cases e.g. Wth Flex, permission was given by Adobbe to use the trademark. Has > the company given permission to use their trademark? If so, how is it allowed > to be used? This should be included in the proposal. > > > Also, I don't think the time itself is an issue but the trust and > > certainty, because Pekko renames all its references to Akka after > > entering the incubator. > > Pekko was forced to rename due to a hostile license change and they didn't > own the name. The proposal stated that they would do this. > > > So, Justin, your comment is not a reason also, but a suspect for > > uncertainty if "some entities have taken unfair advantage of this". > > This is neither provable nor unfalsifiable. > > It is provable - take a look at the trademarks list. I did not want to > highlight any particular project and sidetrack the discussion. > > I think the proposal needs some improvements as mentioned above. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
