Ok, I have an RC2 ready to go with very minor changes, will kick off [only] a general@ vote and tell dev@ & PPMC they can vote on general@
Max On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:44 AM Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change > I would prefer another Vote to have this checked. > If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I > think everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so > its just about waiting 72hrs but ensure that everything is alright. > > Julian > > Am 22.08.19, 19:21 schrieb "Alan Gates" <alanfga...@gmail.com>: > > I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing > anything of > import. I'd just regen the package with the change, create the new > hash, > and let everyone know. I don't see any reason to drag back through the > voting process on two lists over this. > > Alan. > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43 PM Justin Mclean < > jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Oh here's something. Somewhere inside the source release I have a > version > > > string that says "0.34.0rc1" and that now I'm realizing should > really say > > > "0.34.0" as it becomes an official release. Now changing that > string will > > > make for a different SHA. > > > > That's a bit awkward. It would be best to call a vote again if it > needs to > > be changed, given the changes shod be minor it shod be easy to > review. > > > > Other IPMC members might have another view. Anyone? > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > >