Ok, I have an RC2 ready to go with very minor changes, will kick off [only]
a general@ vote and tell dev@ & PPMC they can vote on general@

Max

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:44 AM Julian Feinauer <
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change
> I would prefer another Vote to have this checked.
> If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I
> think everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so
> its just about waiting 72hrs but ensure that everything is alright.
>
> Julian
>
> Am 22.08.19, 19:21 schrieb "Alan Gates" <alanfga...@gmail.com>:
>
>     I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing
> anything of
>     import.  I'd just regen the package with the change, create the new
> hash,
>     and let everyone know.  I don't see any reason to drag back through the
>     voting process on two lists over this.
>
>     Alan.
>
>     On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43 PM Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
>     wrote:
>
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > > Oh here's something. Somewhere inside the source release I have a
> version
>     > > string that says "0.34.0rc1" and that now I'm realizing should
> really say
>     > > "0.34.0" as it becomes an official release. Now changing that
> string will
>     > > make for a different SHA.
>     >
>     > That's a bit awkward. It would be best to call a vote again if it
> needs to
>     > be changed, given the changes shod be minor it shod be easy to
> review.
>     >
>     > Other IPMC members might have another view. Anyone?
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Justin
>     > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>     > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to