Hi,
I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change I
would prefer another Vote to have this checked.
If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I think
everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so its just
about waiting 72hrs but ensure that everything is alright.
Julian
Am 22.08.19, 19:21 schrieb "Alan Gates" <alanfga...@gmail.com>:
I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing anything of
import. I'd just regen the package with the change, create the new hash,
and let everyone know. I don't see any reason to drag back through the
voting process on two lists over this.
Alan.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Oh here's something. Somewhere inside the source release I have a
version
> > string that says "0.34.0rc1" and that now I'm realizing should really
say
> > "0.34.0" as it becomes an official release. Now changing that string
will
> > make for a different SHA.
>
> That's a bit awkward. It would be best to call a vote again if it needs to
> be changed, given the changes shod be minor it shod be easy to review.
>
> Other IPMC members might have another view. Anyone?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
