Proposal name changed, new WIKI page link, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/DolphinSchedulerProposal
Sheng Wu 吴晟 Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin Twitter, wusheng1108 Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月19日周一 下午11:28写道： > Hi Justin and Incubator > > Regarding the project name potential conflict risk, the EasyScheduler > community decided to choose a new name. > Through a public community vote[1], they are going to use > `DolphinScheduler` as the new project name. > > Later, I will change the proposal and sync update w/ new link to here. > > Thank you. > > > [1] > https://github.com/analysys/EasyScheduler/issues/701#issuecomment-522626780 > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月18日周日 上午8:29写道： > >> Hi Justin >> >> Inline >> >> Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2019年8月18日周日 上午7:25写道： >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for your proposal, it looks good. >>> >>> I have a couple of questions: >>> - Re the name, other software exists with the same name e.g. [1] (and >>> others) Has the project considered that it may not be able to keep this >>> name and what it would do if this was the case? >>> >> >> Oh, that is new, thanks for pointing that out in first place. From my >> perspective, it is better to rename now than later. >> >> >>> - The NOTICE file refers to the The Analysys Foundation [2] what is the >>> relation of this group to the project? Has the community agreed to want to >>> move the project to the Apache Software Foundation? Is that documented >>> anywhere? >>> >> >> First, the Analysys is a company, not a Foundation. >> And Yes. >> >> In the proposal, we have this. >> > Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan >> > As soon as EasyScheduler is approved to join Apache Incubator, Analysys >> will provide the Software Grant Agreement(SGA) and intial committers will >> submit ICLA(s). The code is already licensed under the Apache > Software >> License, version 2.0. >> >> We have got confirmation from them, SGA will be submitted by Analysys. >> This is not documented, but from I known, they will submit the SGA soon >> after this proposal accepted. I will make sure the SGA filed before the >> repositories transformation. >> >> At the same time, the community has approved the move too. Here is the >> discussion GitHub issue, >> https://github.com/analysys/EasyScheduler/issues/638 >> >> >>> - I notice the source files header already state “Licensed to the Apache >>> Software Foundation”, I assume this is not actually the case. It looks to >>> me that the headers may of been replaced, that may make IP provenance / >>> clearance harder. A quick glance shows a number of 3rd party pieces of code >>> that are likely to be in a releases, inckudeing this not listed in your >>> dependancies. Is the project aware of this and what’s required here? >>> >> >> I will check w/ them and get back later. >> For dependency list, they replace w/ a short version in the proposal, >> considering before the first incubator release, they plan to remove some >> dependency libs. >> Do we need the whole list? Including every dependency. We used to have >> that before. >> >> >>> - It looks like the community mostly discusses things on instant >>> messaging are they prepared to move the important bits of that conversation >>> over to an ASF mailing list? >>> >> >> Yes. I have told them this is required, and they will do that. >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >>> >>> 1. http://easyscheduler.io >>> 2. https://www.analysys.cn >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> Sheng Wu 吴晟 >> >> Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin >> Twitter, wusheng1108 >> >
