Hi Justin and Incubator Regarding the project name potential conflict risk, the EasyScheduler community decided to choose a new name. Through a public community vote[1], they are going to use `DolphinScheduler` as the new project name.
Later, I will change the proposal and sync update w/ new link to here. Thank you. [1] https://github.com/analysys/EasyScheduler/issues/701#issuecomment-522626780 Sheng Wu 吴晟 Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin Twitter, wusheng1108 Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月18日周日 上午8:29写道： > Hi Justin > > Inline > > Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2019年8月18日周日 上午7:25写道： > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your proposal, it looks good. >> >> I have a couple of questions: >> - Re the name, other software exists with the same name e.g. [1] (and >> others) Has the project considered that it may not be able to keep this >> name and what it would do if this was the case? >> > > Oh, that is new, thanks for pointing that out in first place. From my > perspective, it is better to rename now than later. > > >> - The NOTICE file refers to the The Analysys Foundation [2] what is the >> relation of this group to the project? Has the community agreed to want to >> move the project to the Apache Software Foundation? Is that documented >> anywhere? >> > > First, the Analysys is a company, not a Foundation. > And Yes. > > In the proposal, we have this. > > Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan > > As soon as EasyScheduler is approved to join Apache Incubator, Analysys > will provide the Software Grant Agreement(SGA) and intial committers will > submit ICLA(s). The code is already licensed under the Apache > Software > License, version 2.0. > > We have got confirmation from them, SGA will be submitted by Analysys. > This is not documented, but from I known, they will submit the SGA soon > after this proposal accepted. I will make sure the SGA filed before the > repositories transformation. > > At the same time, the community has approved the move too. Here is the > discussion GitHub issue, > https://github.com/analysys/EasyScheduler/issues/638 > > >> - I notice the source files header already state “Licensed to the Apache >> Software Foundation”, I assume this is not actually the case. It looks to >> me that the headers may of been replaced, that may make IP provenance / >> clearance harder. A quick glance shows a number of 3rd party pieces of code >> that are likely to be in a releases, inckudeing this not listed in your >> dependancies. Is the project aware of this and what’s required here? >> > > I will check w/ them and get back later. > For dependency list, they replace w/ a short version in the proposal, > considering before the first incubator release, they plan to remove some > dependency libs. > Do we need the whole list? Including every dependency. We used to have > that before. > > >> - It looks like the community mostly discusses things on instant >> messaging are they prepared to move the important bits of that conversation >> over to an ASF mailing list? >> > > Yes. I have told them this is required, and they will do that. > > >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. http://easyscheduler.io >> 2. https://www.analysys.cn >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin > Twitter, wusheng1108 >
