On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 23:35, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Is there a problem we are trying to solve or is this just a concern that > > it might become a problem as we scale? > > It’s already a problem. I suggest you look at the missing mentors / mentors > who don’t sign off report and look at how they were appointed. I can post the > stats if you want, but perhaps not to this list. > > Changing this would also mean people who want to be IPMC members need to do a > little work at the IPMC (and it should be a low bar), that hopefully means > more a bit more knowledge transfer / active mentors self select and a few > more people helping the IPMC out. > > Plus it’s different to how every other PMC appoints people, I don't see why > the incubator needs to be special in this regard.
I think this may cause more work for the Incubator. Instead of ASF members offering themselves, the PMC will have to actively seek out new candidates. Also, I don't think there is anything stopping the IPMC from inviting new members now. > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
