Not really Ted, but we’re all grown up’s here and I wouldn’t let my 5 and 7
year olds behave like the more vocal members of the board do on both sides
of the arguments.

I dislike moderation and to behonest, with the changes of the moderation
list for board@ part of me wants to argue that in actual fact *no* board or
ex-board members should have the ability to moderate because everyones
judgement is clouded! But I shall not, as that opens yet another can of
worms.

I retire from board lurking and life until this mess is sorted out, and I
don’t expect that to be any time soon.

Tom


On 21 July 2019 at 10:44:55, Ted Dunning (ted.dunn...@gmail.com) wrote:

Can you make suggestions about what levels of moderation / social
enforcement would make the mailing list tolerable for you but (from your
understanding) would be acceptable?

-- 


Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston 
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.




All engagements 
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and its 
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed and 
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise 
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions 
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no 
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by 
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice 
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.

Reply via email to