Hi, > My understanding as an IPMC member is that there are some items in a release > that can be allowed where they would not be in a TLP release. These things > have historically drawn -1 votes from IPMC members.
Historically we have allowed such releases and they got +1 votes. If you look as several recent votes you see issues that would very likely be -1 votes on a TLP. > I think there is consensus that a podling release does not have to conform in > every respect to what we expect from a TLP release. I agree. > The detail of what is minor versus what it a blocker is the most important > thing that needs clarity. As of now, I don't see consensus although I see > movement. I think we’re close to be able to come up with a list that people can agree on. There's perhaps only one or two items that people don’t agree on. I think that would be useful no matter what the outcome of this proposal. But that leaves the issue that some people (including ex board members and podlings) have asked we should be more lenient than that. I don’t think the IPMC could do so without permission from the board, hence this proposal. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
