Hi - > On Apr 1, 2019, at 2:51 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd also like to see those mentors / IPMC members vote with more than just a > +1 and provide a list of what they checked. If they could use something like > this all the better [1]. > > I wouldn’t be for removing the second step of letting the IPMC look at it, > reasonably often serious issues are found in that step. By skilling that we > risk some podlings going all the way to propose graduation while having > releases that don’t follow ASF policy. This is a situation I’d like to avoid.
If the podling has three engaged Mentors that do VOTE and move the podling forward then I would suggest following Myrle’s plan and the podling releases and then sends a [REVIEW] or [DISCUSS]. I also suggest that the are the mentor’s helpful include an are your mentor’s voting? I know from my own experience that knowing that there will be a round of voting on general@ makes it easy for me to not hurry to VOTE on dev@. Regards, Dave > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
