If only some people are like me they joined to support a specific podling by giving their +1 on a vote. I did the same, then went silent for a year or so and am only now starting to get interested in the Incubator workings again.
Maybe if we could change the requirements on binding votes for podling proposals we wouldn't need as many people in the IPMC? As far as I know every member can become IPMC member. So if we change the rules that every member vote is binding (whether or not they are in the IPMC) people wouldn't need to join the club. On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:50 PM Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:33 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > > > > And most probably do not participate. Would asking for those 100 odd > > people to be removed come across as friendly? > > > > I'd be +1 on removing them. a.) While kindness towards our fellow PMC > members is important, the role of the Incubator is to be friendly to > incoming projects. b.) It's not unkind to our fellow PMC members. They are > welcome to come back when they're ready. > > But I also don't think it's going to solve anything. Those people aren't > contributing to solutions *or* problems. > > Best, > Myrle >
