+1.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:59 PM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release
> candidate 2
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4b445460d36d098be1c1e60e29869cf243e2bc37bd2b84ca7b1daab3@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
>
> Result thread:
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/60e3272326cf93100370fa5b01a54a4b2f18f95462553b5a1acfd456@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> The community raised the following issues which are not considered as
> release stopper:
>
> 1. NOTICE year is wrong (2018): Not considered a stopping issue as release
> was started in 2018.
> 2. TVM NOTICE missing - TVM NOTICE file was added post the commit ID used
> in MXNet v1.4.0.rc2 release, not considered a stopping issue
> 3. build with make passes, but build with cmake failed in
> 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest
> 4. Recent MKLDNN upgrade prevents us from offering binary distribution for
> earlier versions before OSX 10.13.
>
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc2
>
> The release hash is e999a46
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/e999a46a8ca1383e78a9178dc65fa91e6e656c26
> >
> :
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/e999a46a8ca1383e78a9178dc65fa91e6e656c26
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
>
> The vote will be open at least 72 hours (Sunday February 10th 4pm PST) and
> until sufficient votes are received.
>
> [ ] +1 release this package as 1.4.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
>
> Best regards,
> Steffen
>

Reply via email to