I see moving plugins.netbeans.org out of Oracle control as being a graduation goal, not a start incubation goal.
John On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:28 PM Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > > > > won't plugins.netbeans.org run for another few months with Oracle > > infrastructure? If it does, is it urgent enough to block incubation? For > me > > it does not look that way. > > > Indeed, this is not an urgent issue from the point of view of NetBeans. I > feel it is an urgent point for some of those in this discussion who want to > be sure there won't be frustration later down the line when it turns out > that Apache will not be hosting the NetBeans plugins. Let me reiterate -- > in the same way as Maven plugins are not hosted by Apache, the NetBeans > community is under no assumption that Apache will be hosting NetBeans > plugins. > > And we will find a solution, we are working on it actively right now, > though there is no big immediate rush for this. > > Gj > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> > wrote: > > > On 26.09.2016 17:04, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > [...] > > > >> b) We vote on the NetBeans proposal without waiting, and the podling > >> assumes the risk of having to wait for budget or technical solutions > >> to run plugins.netbeans.org at or via the ASF. > >> > > > > won't plugins.netbeans.org run for another few months with Oracle > > infrastructure? If it does, is it urgent enough to block incubation? For > me > > it does not look that way. > > > > bye Jochen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
