Jake, I"m definitely interested in hearing more. I've been off and on trying to get ActiveMQ Artemis builds up on docker. I haven't gotten quite enough of an answer from infra, and don't know enough myself to get it working right.
I suspect, from my own artifactory experience, the bintray experience is going to be easier. Do we have docs anywhere that point to how to build? John On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:53 PM Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote: > We have our own docker registry available for projects to use, its hosted > out of bintray. Access can be granted per project via an infra ticket > request. > > Dockerhub is used in an automated builds capacity, we can set it to only > build tagged versions. > > Happy to answer any questions about either offering > > -Jake > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > wrote: > > > > > FWIW, I say that we should just adopt a repository.apache.org approach > > > and declare that nightly/snapshot Docker images can only be distributed > > > from our own Docker repo. That way there's absolutely 0 chance anybody > > > can get them by accident. > > > > Running our own hub a la repository.apache.org would address the > concerns > > about distributing unreleased materials outside the development > > community. It > > sounds like a worthwhile Infra feature request. +1 > > > > Having `latest` on the central dockerhub point derive from the last > > official release sounds like a good move, regardless. > > > > For background: > > > > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy#release-definition > > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy#publication > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
