+1 to Marvin's suggestion. If we make incubation as much like operating as a TLP then graduating podlings will be better prepared.
-Taylor > On Jun 5, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> IMO as long as that second email is private, then we could probably drop the >> requirement for the first notification. > > +1 to drop one or the other. > > I would argue to drop the second instead and only send the email > notifying the IPMC that a VOTE is taking place, because that saves 3 > days. > > This is still parallel to the Board procedure, in that when a PMC > Chair sends a [NOTICE] email to the Board, they are not required to > include a link to the [VOTE] result -- that's a requirement which > applies to other PMC Members, but not the Chair. Thus a Chair can send > a [NOTICE] to the Board before the election completes. > > The parallel isn't perfect, but it's never going to be because PPMCs > don't have Chairs. So I'd opt for convenience and expediency in this > case. > > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
