Hi John, > Le 29 déc. 2015 à 00:24, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > > Hi Serge, > >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:58 PM Serge Huber <shu...@jahia.com> wrote: >> >> Hello Niall (and Daniel), >> >> Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed >> quite aggressive in tone, but I have heard this before and should have >> remembered it. I also feel partly responsible for this because I setup the >> initial build project and didn’t do this initially. > I'm not sure who Roy is. Maybe you could share a link to some email? > Hopefully we're not coming across too tough here :-(
I was talking about this email from Roy Fielding that Niall referenced here: http://s.apache.org/srcrel but it's not really important. > > >> JB has been really working hard on helping this project getting off the >> ground and it’s a shame this was caught so late (but it’s good that it was >> caught nonetheless). I’d like to keep him as motivated as possible so I >> take the opportunity to thank him here for all his hard work. > > JB's a great guy to have on any project. +1 :) > > >> >> What is the best next step now ? Retract the release and build a source >> package and resubmit that for approval ? Wait for the vote to complete and >> get rejected, build a source package and re-open a vote for approval ? > > You kind of have to in this case. You don't have a valid release. We vote > on the source release, the binary release is a convenience for end users so > they don't need to compile the sources. > > >> >> Regards, >> Serge… >> >>>> On 28 déc. 2015, at 21:28, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do >>>> for other project. >>>> >>>> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating >>>> >>>> (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read). >>>> >>>> Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I >>>> will include a source artifacts. >>> >>> "The Apache Software Foundation exists to create open source software. >>> Thus, the fundamental requirement for a release is that it consist of the >>> necessary source code to build the project." >>> >>> See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid >>> >>> So, yes its a complete blocker. >>> >>> Also worth reading: http://s.apache.org/srcrel >>> >>> Niall >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution. >>>>>> >>>>>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it >>>>>> helps. >>>>> >>>>> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains >>>>> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release. >>>>> >>>>> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons: >>>>> >>>>> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may >> not >>>>> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled >>>>> components are not open source, even if they were built from open >> source." >>>>> >>>>> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the >>>>> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package. >>>>> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on >>>>> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval. >>>>> >>>>> With regards, >>>>> Daniel. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I >>>>>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm >> not >>>>>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>> Daniel. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 >> +1s. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vote thread: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3c5679aace.1080...@nanthrax.net%3E >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Result thread: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual >>>>>>>>> tests, >>>>>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails >> you >>>>>>>>> referenced. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>> Daniel. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>
