On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 08:48 +0900, Brian Spector wrote: > Hi Alex, thank you for the suggestion, but from our point of view, as I > outlined below, we would disadvantage the project as a whole by not having > the MIRACL name in it. > > At the same time, I completely understand the concern that a company who > creates a product based on OpenMiracl might feel themselves disadvantaged > by having to state an attribution 'based on Apache OpenMiracl' while > MIRACL, the company, sells a product called Datacenter Cryptosystem will > also say 'based on Apache OpenMiracl'. We get that.
If folks are uneasy about OpenMiracl, how far does that extend? Would (for example) a name taking the "Mira" stem be sufficiently distinct for those expressing concerns here? For example, Mirabile (Latin pronunciation) kind-of offers an element of historic continuity through the linguistic association with the miracle. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
