On Nov 15, 2015 10:14 AM, "Justin Erenkrantz" <jus...@erenkrantz.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, November 14, 2015, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > No. I can use whatever criteria I like to justify my vote on a podlings > > graduation, if it's in line with asf philosophy. This document is, and > > accurately reflects the criteria I use when voting on a graduation. That > > is, the document reflects me, not vice versa, as I said above. > > > > It's very akin to the docs that circulate around member election time. They > > are useful guidelines but nobody is compelled to adhere to any particular > > one of them. > > > > The difference is that member elections are majority-based - graduation > votes are essentially subject to veto. > > There's a huge difference there. If you are subjecting all of your votes > to that checklist and will actively block podlings that do not meet your > personal guidelines, you are making everyone else subject to it. -- justin
Sure. If these were just my personal guidelines, that would indeed be a concern. I'd assert, however, that we already have members voting on their own personal guidelines, they just haven't written them down for the rest of us to see.
