-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello,
I did try to use the CLI to build it but ran into java issues since windows seems determined to use java 8 and i can only get java 7 to run inside eclipse. Getting windows to use an older version of java seems like a fairly difficult or poorly documented task nowadays. Suggestions welcome (though as noted earlier they may belong a a different list). Cheers, Ian On 08/11/15 19:41, John D. Ament wrote: > Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps > required to make it compile they should be shared. On Nov 8, 2015 > 14:33, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> Ian, >> >> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the >> legal aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical >> merits can be resolved in subsequent releases. >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote: > Hello, > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars > (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following > issues: > > 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: > Cannot find > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} > imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > Resolved by commenting out > > <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/> > > <!-- Import macros --> <import file="${build.macros.path}"/> > > and tried again > > 2) > > BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project > "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp". > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files" > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}" > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" > /> <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/> </target> > > 3) > > BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: > Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name > is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any > custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any > <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken place. > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > setting somewhere? > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK > NOTICE OK > > Cheers, > > Ian > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> +1 binding. >>>>> >>>>> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next >>>>> release. The text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of >>>>> copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software >>>>> Foundation”. >>>>> >>>>> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures >>>>> and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor >>>>> issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but >>>>> it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly >>>>> as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - >>>>> All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary >>>>> file in source release (but see below) - can compile from >>>>> source - test pass >>>>> >>>>> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source >>>>> release, I assume you have permission from the person who >>>>> took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in >>>>> the LICENSE. >>>>> >>>>> There's a number of binary file without extensions in >>>>> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this >>>>> the case? Where did these images come from? >>>>> >>>>> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE >>>>> and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though >>>>> check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the >>>>> NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s >>>>> actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is >>>>> mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software >>>>> in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2] >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, Justin >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >>>>> >>>>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ - --- >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> > >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- - - >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWQO8WAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5Bi0H/R1tQzrcoBZAegXKP3ZgOriq 2ad3U6bOtr7eod52KFsoT9bnfC8Nekoqe6/F7RCh0qzmUP0Nchct3/OVf8atfy8J c2GdHl/Wp4Lony7cxdnHn8a5wdus+SHrY/edvsYoHSCHkcQL24i9Jd34sT4AjJIO f5YUnTlf3JRHMui/TRuxR+HNmzTANsY4Hl0UZgkm/N1YK7BIDfTJDBDF8Sm9aRVJ n9F0IbIOu8MFCMoewmJbmb806+QepfV+MU5AniS01iFYqKX/nX+txf/hS2qukBj/ jWvyTVDJ7E/qkSLawvX/YlXXFnt/tpSqSobOmMbdENFAOhGWwFEOsa4BgLhao38= =t/Me -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org