On 10.10.2015 09:06, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 10/10/2015 07:51 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> We should address perceived, and certainly provable, instances of >> corruption at the Foundation directly, rather than prescribe policy that >> seeks to prevent future instances as if there is a precedent (but there >> isn't one here... at least one not spoken aloud, right?). > We shouldn't need to have publicly available cases of wrong-doings to > say "no wrong-doings please". We hold our politicians to this standard > where I come from - it's called the Arm's Length Principle, and it's > worked very well.
But the grounds for implementing such a policy are the thousands of years of history with millions of examples of politicians being narcissistic, corrupt, anti-social nutcases. How many examples of corrupt, anti-social nutcases can you count amongst ASF members or IPMC members, that would justify your proposal? -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
