Ross, It seems like there are multiple issues with this vote thread.
1. It looks like it was started on the dev list, but then sent to general asking for a 3rd IPMC vote. This is not generally how things are done. A new vote thread should be started to cover the vote on the general list. The IPMC votes from dev@ would carry over. 2. This vote was never summarized. If either of these statements is incorrect, please include a link to where I can find the email with the relevant information. Thanks, John On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:44 PM Ross Gardler <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > The Ripple project has voted on a release but we are short one IPMC vote. > Can someone on the IPMC please review the release package and vote (see > details below). > > Thanks > Ross > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Barham [mailto:tim.bar...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 11:53 PM > To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30 > > Vote results are: > > IPMC votes: 2 > Ross Gardler > Christian Grobmeier > > PPMC votes: 1 > Tim Barham > > Other votes: 1 > Arzhan Kinzhalin > > Thanks! > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:12 AM > To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30 > > Sorry for my delayed vote. I haven't seen a result yet, so I just checked > the release. > > It looks find for me: +1 > > I have seen minor things which are not blocking: the NOTICE file contains > 2012 as year. Maybe update to 2012 - 2015 with the next release. > The sha file contains lower case numbers. But: > > gpg --print-md SHA512 > > outputs uppercase letters. Not sure if there is a standard, but maybe we > should include uppercase letters in the next sha file generation. Please > note, I am not really into all that stuff, so this will work, but it saw it. > > Other than that: great job guys. Sorry once again for my delayed response. > Lets hope others are quicker than I am! > > Christian > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 20:41, Tim Barham wrote: > > Sorry for the delay getting this out, everyone. Travel + other > > distractions + my Mac not being hooked up. Thanks to Arzhan for a > > bunch of work figuring out OpenLayers licenses. Anyway... here it is... > > > > > > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.30. > > > > > > > > The package you are voting on is available for review at > > http://1drv.ms/1H9yF5h. It was published from its corresponding git tag: > > > > incubator-ripple: 0.9.30 (7830f1ac70) > > > > > > > > Since this will be an official Apache release of Ripple (another > > attempt at our first official release!), we must be particularly > > careful that it complies with all Apache guidelines for an incubator > > release. As such, before voting +1, please refer to and verify > > compliance with the checklist at > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list. > > > > > > > > If anyone has concerns that we don't meet any of these requirements, > > please don't hesitate to raise them here so we can discuss and make > > changes if necessary. > > > > > > > > If you do give a +1 vote, please include what steps you took in order > > to be confident in the release. > > > > > > > > Please also note from Ross's recent email: > > > > > > > > > What we need is three +1 "binding" votes, in reality that means > > > three > > > > > IPMC members. Once a project graduates it means three project > > > > > management committee members. However, as a mentor (therefore having > > > a > > > > > binding vote) I look to the project participants to indicate their > > > > > preference and (assuming no blocking issues on an IP check) I'll > > > > > always vote in support of the communities non- binding votes. > > > > > > > > So please, even though your vote may not be binding, take some time to > > review the release and vote! > > > > > > > > Upon a successful vote, we will arrange for the archive to be uploaded > > to dist/incubator/ and publish it to NPM. > > > > > > > > I vote +1: > > > > * I verified build works and tests all pass. > > > > * I verified license headers with Apache RAT (via 'jake rat'). > > > > * I manually verified all third party licenses in node_modules. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
