The Ripple project has voted on a release but we are short one IPMC vote. Can someone on the IPMC please review the release package and vote (see details below).
Thanks Ross -----Original Message----- From: Tim Barham [mailto:tim.bar...@microsoft.com] Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 11:53 PM To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30 Vote results are: IPMC votes: 2 Ross Gardler Christian Grobmeier PPMC votes: 1 Tim Barham Other votes: 1 Arzhan Kinzhalin Thanks! Tim -----Original Message----- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:12 AM To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30 Sorry for my delayed vote. I haven't seen a result yet, so I just checked the release. It looks find for me: +1 I have seen minor things which are not blocking: the NOTICE file contains 2012 as year. Maybe update to 2012 - 2015 with the next release. The sha file contains lower case numbers. But: gpg --print-md SHA512 outputs uppercase letters. Not sure if there is a standard, but maybe we should include uppercase letters in the next sha file generation. Please note, I am not really into all that stuff, so this will work, but it saw it. Other than that: great job guys. Sorry once again for my delayed response. Lets hope others are quicker than I am! Christian On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 20:41, Tim Barham wrote: > Sorry for the delay getting this out, everyone. Travel + other > distractions + my Mac not being hooked up. Thanks to Arzhan for a > bunch of work figuring out OpenLayers licenses. Anyway... here it is... > > > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.30. > > > > The package you are voting on is available for review at > http://1drv.ms/1H9yF5h. It was published from its corresponding git tag: > > incubator-ripple: 0.9.30 (7830f1ac70) > > > > Since this will be an official Apache release of Ripple (another > attempt at our first official release!), we must be particularly > careful that it complies with all Apache guidelines for an incubator > release. As such, before voting +1, please refer to and verify > compliance with the checklist at > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list. > > > > If anyone has concerns that we don't meet any of these requirements, > please don't hesitate to raise them here so we can discuss and make > changes if necessary. > > > > If you do give a +1 vote, please include what steps you took in order > to be confident in the release. > > > > Please also note from Ross's recent email: > > > > > What we need is three +1 "binding" votes, in reality that means > > three > > > IPMC members. Once a project graduates it means three project > > > management committee members. However, as a mentor (therefore having > > a > > > binding vote) I look to the project participants to indicate their > > > preference and (assuming no blocking issues on an IP check) I'll > > > always vote in support of the communities non- binding votes. > > > > So please, even though your vote may not be binding, take some time to > review the release and vote! > > > > Upon a successful vote, we will arrange for the archive to be uploaded > to dist/incubator/ and publish it to NPM. > > > > I vote +1: > > * I verified build works and tests all pass. > > * I verified license headers with Apache RAT (via 'jake rat'). > > * I manually verified all third party licenses in node_modules. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tim > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
