Jakob, I was curious about you statement about Kafka so I went and looked.
I only looked at the client code, but it appears that it is all under org.apache.kafka. Can you say more about what you meant by "Kafka has done fine without doing so"? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is no reason to change the packages. Kafka has done fine > without doing so, as has been OpenNLP. There are no commercial or > vendor concerns. There is no legal requirement to do so. It's a > purely technical issue (how Java happens to organize code). > > -jakob > > > On 7 August 2015 at 21:41, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > > By that notion, practically all incoming projects would be in non > > org.apache namespaces, and that would be a different kind of detrimental > > situation. > > > > So, my(!) general recommendation has been; for any releases that maintain > > 100% compatibility, keep the namespace as before. But as soon as a major > > (1.x -> 2.0) release is made, that the namespace is changing with it. > > > > Doing a search/replace for "s/import datafu/import org.apache.datafu" > > across N files (and you can provide the script) is not a big deal > compared > > to whatever other compatibility-breaking changes that are introduced in > the > > major upgrade. > > > > But as Luciano says; The sooner, the better, as fewer people are > impacted. > > > > Niclas > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Leave it datafu. The normal way of doing Java namespaces is terrible > bloat, > >> and the change would be breaking. > >> > >> On Friday, August 7, 2015, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Hayes < > >> > matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > Roman Shaposhnik suggested I open a discussion on the following > topic: > >> > > > >> > > For Apache DataFu, all of the Java classes are declared in a > datafu.* > >> > > namespace. This has been the naming convention since the DataFu > >> project > >> > > started in 2010. Since DataFu became part of the Apache incubation > >> > > process, the topic has come up of moving all of the classes into a > >> > > org.apache.datafu.* namespace. This was first discussed in January > >> 2014 > >> > > (see DATAFU-7) and most recently again in the past couple weeks. > The > >> > > consensus at the time last year was that it would be a huge pain for > >> > users > >> > > and not worth the cost. It would break any script out there > currently > >> > > using DataFu. Also Jakob Homan and Russell Journey pointed out that > >> this > >> > > is just a convention and not all Apache projects follow it. Since > we > >> > would > >> > > like DataFu to graduate sometime soon it would be good to clarify > what > >> > the > >> > > requirements are on package naming conventions before we do a > release. > >> > > > >> > > Thoughts? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Matt > >> > > > >> > > >> > Current statement on Incubator website > >> > > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#repackaging > >> > > >> > But, if DataFu will do the repackaging, better sooner (before > graduation) > >> > then later. > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Luciano Resende > >> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >> datasyndrome.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
