On 24.07.2015 01:25, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: > I do agree that our Jira handling could be better and believe that > community has already responded to these discussions and addressed some of > the raised concerns. The truth is that so far many Jira discussions have > happened on the dev list, including community members sending notifications > about starting and ending work on Jiras and discussing Jira issues on the > dev list as well. This was a preferred way selected by the community that > we followed. I do agree that Jiras should be updated better and will > encourage everyone to do so going forward.
As a small reminder, evidently to IPMC members as well as podling committers: Jira is not the official archive of "what happened" on the project. Only the dev@ list is. There is no requirement for any project to use the ASF Jira instance; there's not even a requirement to use an issue tracker. Suddenly making the contents of tickets in Jira an issue for graduation is just a bit out of order IMNSHO. The important question is whether the development process is open, not whether some entries in Jira appear to have adequate comments. -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
