My only concern is confusion over pTLP and incubator. That's a manageable concern but this lost is so large I fear it might keep recurring.
Just a word of caution, not an objection. Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: jan i<mailto:j...@apache.org> Sent: 3/22/2015 9:04 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok? On Sunday, March 22, 2015, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > In the recent discussions about provisional TLPs and direct-to-TLP > projects we're missing a public place where the proposals (board > resolutions etc) for such projects are discussed and worked on. > > Are people ok with using this list and the Incubator wiki for those things? +1 of course rgds jan i > > The Incubator PMC won't have a say in how those projects proceed, but > as this is about creating new projects, and as a number of steps are > similar to incoming or graduating podlings, I think working here makes > sense. > > Thoughts? > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
