> On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > > With that said, I do agree that a board report is not the appropriate venue > for the Weegee paddy wagon parade. What would be more useful and more easily > digested is a general top level opaque metric, e.g. 55% of the mentors signed > off on reports, and then for each podling a similar metric. >
podling mentors signoff percent Aurora 4 3 75% Brooklyn 10 5 50% Calcite 3 3 100% Corinthia 2 2 100% DataFu 3 2 67% HTrace 6 4 67% Ignite 5 4 80% Kalumet 4 2 50% Kylin 3 3 100% Lens 3 3 100% MRQL 3 2 67% NiFi 7 5 71% NPanday 2 0 0% ODF Toolkit 4 1 25% Parquet 5 3 60% Ranger 5 3 60% SAMOA 4 1 25% Samza 3 2 67% Tamaya 4 2 50% Taverna 5 3 60% Usergrid 6 4 67% Zeppelin 5 4 80% total 96 61 64%
