On Jan 5, 2015, at 6:15 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: >>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. ... >>> >>> IIUC the main difference (besides subtle naming changes) is that pTLPs >>> vote on their own releases, based on pTLP PMC members who have been >>> accepted by the board? >>> >>> So more work for the board, and each pTLP needs to form an acceptable >>> PMC roster with at least 4-5 members? >> >> My thoughts exactly. What this proposal effectively does is pawn off the >> responsibility of holding mentors accountable to the board. > > No. The original uncooked pTLP scheme did that. This scheme locates > that responsibility in the renamed committee, which serves the board > by supervising the pTLPs. They aren't mentors, they are PMC members. A rose by any other name? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
