I am down with this, but would really rather allow reports that have less than all of the mentors signing off to be accepted.
Right now, I am involved in mentoring a new podling and at least one other of the mentors has done literally nothing. No email answers, no help editing the proposal. No setting up mailing lists. I expect the level of effort to be stable. Sure, at some point, he ought to be booted from being a mentor. But in the meantime, we have two very active mentors who are busy helping the project get going. If we get two sign-offs, is it really necessary penalize the podling? I can see that after 3 reports with a missing mentor, it is reasonable to boot the mentor if there is a safety net and I can see that having no mentor sign-off is a serious problem for the podling in any case. But having *only* two mentors hardly seems like an emergency. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 5:14 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > ... is everyone OK if we mark > > podlings who don't have mentor sign off as monthly?... > > I am ok with that - basically, a report without sign off is like a > missing report. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
