This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: +1 Ted +1 Lars +1 Justin +1 or -1: Grant -0 Jan
I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does that sound? thanks, Jacques On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. > > > > Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. > > > Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses > requires that snippets of source for different operators and system > packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about > this source, much of which is machine generated from templates. > > From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because they > can download it and run Drill with no further build steps. >
